Murphy's Law

Tom Murphy

Archive for May 2008

USC Research identifies PR best practices…

Jerry Swerling from the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication was in touch regarding the release of their fifth study of generally accepted practices (GAP) in Public Relations.

This is (to me) a heavyweight look at the profession including responses from over five hundred practitioners.

There’s some interesting findings including:

  • Low funding for measuring PR effectiveness (with an overage of 6% of budgets going on measurement)
  • The higher you report in the organisation – the higher your budget
  • Companies now most commonly use multiple PR firms

 

The study also identifies a set of best practices:

  • Maintain a higher than average ratio of PR budget to gross revenue (GAP PR/GR Ratio).
  • Report directly and exclusively to the C-Suite.
  • Optimize the C-Suite’s understanding of PR’s current and potential contributions to the success of the organization as a whole.
  • Establish an effective social responsibility strategy for your organization.
  • Establish an effective digital-media strategy for your organization.
  • Establish an effective issues-management strategy for your organization.
  • Optimize integration and coordination of PR/Communications, both within the PR/Communications function, and with other organizational functions.
  • Encourage highly ethical practices across the organization, beginning with communication.
  • Encourage the organization-wide adoption of a long-term strategic point of view, beginning with communication.
  • Encourage the organization-wide adoption of a proactive mindset, beginning with communication.
  • Optimize the integration of PR and reputational considerations into top-level organizational strategies.
  • Measurably contribute to organizational success.

 

This is a detailed research report, relevant to anyone in communications.

 

Download the research

You can download the study in its entirety here (PDF) or you can access the various different sections here.

 

Related news item:

European PR Research

From Richard Bailey I see that EUPRERA (The – deep breath – European Public Relations Education and Research Organisation – sigh) is undertaking a survey on PR and communications management in Europe.

Why not complete this ten minute survey!

Written by Tom Murphy

May 30, 2008 at 9:22 pm

Posted in General

It's Friday… long weekend ahead…

Ahhhh… this is our June public holiday, a great three day weekend. Rain is forecast (it is Ireland after all) but it matters not a jot!

 

Via Kami, here’s an amusing take on Social Media overdose (as an aside I imagine there’ll be a lot more potential characters this time next year!)

 

Via Boing Boing, I think this photo is fantastic…

Written by Tom Murphy

May 30, 2008 at 8:48 pm

Posted in General

Old and New media links

 

  • Trevor "Video" Cook has unearthed some smeedia videos…
    • Josh Bernoff of Forrester on "How to be a social media provocateur"

In response to the recent furore around service downtime, Twitter have responded with a new "Status" blog where you can find the latest information on whether the services is up and what’s the progress dealing with any issues.

image

Luckily the blog is relying on Tumblr and not Twitter 🙂

Written by Tom Murphy

May 29, 2008 at 9:20 pm

Posted in General

Shocker: RSS the source of back problems!

I have a sore back.

After some consideration of the matter, I believe that the only possible cause of the soreness is my trusty RSS Reader FeedDemon.

Now, it’s not FeedDemon’s fault, but the number of times, in any given review of RSS feeds, I have to bend over and pick names off the floor is escalating beyond belief.

I am considering various antidotes to the queasy, nausea I feel reading these blog posts, some medicinal and some physical.

I hope that when I’m rich and famous I don’t start boring people to death with intros like:

"I had breakfast with the man from the moon about sixteen weeks ago…"

 

By all means bore us to death with your post – god knows I do it all the time – but stop the name dropping and get to the point.

 

Update:

Just to clarify this post isn’t about blogging about people you meet. No.  This concerns framing a post as though the VIP (whatever) in question is central to the post when in fact it’s name dropping. These writers are typically too "cool" to write: "Wow I met X, I’ve always admired her and it’s true they look taller on TV". The name dropper is far too sophisticated for that.  The drop actually adds nothing to the post.  It’s for effect, whatever. That’s what this post is about.

Written by Tom Murphy

May 29, 2008 at 8:45 pm

Posted in General

Ireland: Online media shorts…

The Irish Times….

One of the Irish Times’ triumvirate of journalist bloggers, Shane Hegarty has announced he’s putting his “Present Tense” blog on ice for a while. (Interesting (to me anyway) there are over 70 comments on the post so far..). Then there were (as far as I know) two active official Irish Times blogs:

  1. Conor Pope’s PriceWatch blog
  2. Jim Carroll’s On the Record blog

[Other Irish Times related blogs: John Collins, Karlin Lillington, John Butler]

 

Newstalk 106….

In Irish Times (kind of) related news, Karlin Lillington has decided to step down from the Technology slot on Newstalk 106 but will be focusing her energies on a new podcast series. [I assume Mr. Joe Drumgoole is remaining in situ.]

 

Sunday Business Post

I didn’t know Nadine O’Regan from the Sunday Business Post had a blog.

[Other related blogs: Adrian Weckler]

 

Filed under “Other Irish media-related blogs I know”:

 

So what other ones am I missing?

In the spirit of Irish blog-operation… do please feel free to add any more local media blogs 🙂

UPDATE:

Cian GInty passed along a useful list he pulled together here.

Written by Tom Murphy

May 29, 2008 at 6:44 am

Posted in General

PR Round-up…

Devolution of Media

For the uninitiated, Jim Horton is the grandfather (in a nice and not age related way!) of PR blogs, he was the first practitioner publishing content online in a meaningful way, even without RSS :-).  He continues to provide reasoned, in-depth coverage of the industry today, and he’s just published an essay: Devolution of Traditional Media and what it means to PR which takes a look at how changes in the media landscape and the rise of social media may impact PR. Worth a read.

 

Twitter PR

Shel Holtz has a great post, which could have been included in the round-up below, looking at Twitter and how their recent service problems are a great example of why communicators can add value to a business and an entrepreneur.

Unfortunately, most people who make such observations about PR base their views only on what they observe. What they observe is pitching. PR pitches are blatant and, frequently, annoying. (Heck, I work in PR and get frazzled at the staggering number of clueless pitches I receive every day. In a PRWeek article, Wired.com’s senior editor, Dylan Tweney, articulates what a lot of victims of bad pitching feel: “I don’t have the luxury of blacklisting people, because if they have news, it doesn’t matter whether I like them or not, or whether they’ve been good at pitching in the past. I’ll still need to hear about it.")

What’s not visible to most people, however, is the work that occupies most PR practitioners most of the time, and it isn’t pitching or getting ink. The mere fact that pitches are what you see most of the time doesn’t mean that’s the lion’s share of what goes on in most shops. If Loic were to spend a single day with an account team at any well-known agency, he’d probably amend his post.

 

 

Ready for the Digital Savvy?

Sarah Perez at ReadWriteWeb reports on new research from Scarborough Research on the "digitally savvy" – the most high-tech consumers in the US.

 

According to Gary Meo, SVP, Print and Digital Media Services at Scarborough Research, this is an important group to monitor because their shopping patterns could "presage behaviors of consumers across the country."

Written by Tom Murphy

May 27, 2008 at 9:10 pm

Posted in General

PR & Social Media.. there is a bigger picture kids… redux

OK so since I pressed "Publish" on my last post on this matter, there’s been some additional commentary I thought was worth following up on.

 

Pull back from the picture

The one-and-only Mr. Scoble weighed in on the matter of "PR Secrets". As with Monsieur Le Meur’s post, Mr. Scoble makes some interesting points, but again these people are talking about PR as if:

a) It’s only concerned with Web 2.0 and the online world – it’s not

b) PR is press relations – it’s not

 

There’s a couple of points I’d call out:

PR now stands for “Professional Relationships.”

No, Robert, PR stands for PUBLIC Relations, it’s about communicating effectively with ALL individuals, groups and communities relevant to a company, group or individual. While I know there’s a lot of kudos for inventing new words, acronyms and terms (think "Jumping the Shark", Smeedia 🙂 , etc.) the real definition of PR is fine thanks.

Robert makes a lot of sense, but again, it’s a partial commentary that ignores much of what PR people do day-in, day-out, albeit there’s some good advice around online communications.

The reality is that PR people are going to have to continue washing and dressing and going out into the real world for some time to come.

 

You don’t need PR at all if you have a great product.

 

Oh my word. Oh my word. <sigh>

 

Some PR advice

image

I found a video commentary from Neville Hobson via Trevor Cook.

 

What’s the issue with "targets"?

Todd Defren has a post related to Mr. La Meur’s point on the use of the term Targets.

My response? Target, target, target, target, target, target, target, target.

PR has always been about relationship building. 

The tools and the nature of how that works may be changing and evolving, but relationships have always been central to great PR.  That ain’t new.

So what if people use the word target?  Does it really matter.  What if we replace targets with Blancmanges? Is that better?

"We’re aiming at a number of blancmanges."

Jeez.

Let’s start calling out some of this stuff folks.  Just because it’s "right-on" doesn’t mean it’s true or meaningful.

Just my two cents.

Written by Tom Murphy

May 27, 2008 at 8:45 pm

Posted in General