How communications is changing…

When new developments occur, human nature takes over and we rush to the new new thing and automatically begin thinking about how it will irrevocably change our lives.

The Internet boom was driven by the belief that off-line services, locations etc. would be superceeded by their online equivalents. I think, that even now, only four years on, it sounds kind of quaint and far fetched.

The reality is that the Internet has taken its rightful place alongside print, radio and television as a viable and important commerical medium. However, the Internet differs in two major respects when compared to the other mass media. Firstly the speed it was adopted and secondly unlike the others, the Internet continues to change and innovate all the time.

This continous innovation is one of the major challenges for Public Relations practitioners.

The good news is that PR practitioners are getting more interactive ways to communicate with target audiences. The bad news is that we must constantly keep on top of the more important developments and be cogniscent of how they affect the products and services we offer our clients and employers.

This post was promoted by a piece written by Elizabeth Albrycht which looked at the possible end of mass communication.

I think the growing media maze we are facing when we help organizations to communicate with their audiences are being affected by a wide range of factors, which when you bring them altogether raise some serious challenges.

The sophisticated consumer

People are far more educated in the twenty first century than at any time in our past. The result is a more difficult target for PR. Where before companies drove their message out with hyberbole and aggression, now consumers discount such gusto and want to drill down into the real details.

The global information center

Consumers don’t just make decisions based on reading or hearing from one source. That information may make them want to evaluate a product or service, but before they hand over their hard earned currency, they do a lot more research than before. As a result the sales model from prospect to customer is becoming more complex and PR must adapt to understand that model.

The Cluetrain effect

The Cluetrain Manifesto was not widely read by the general populace. It’s success has been built among marketing types and Internet experts who passionately believe a new approach to corporate communication and the interaction between the corporation and the consumer. The prescience of it’s message is breathtaking. Speak to your audience in plain language, language they understand or do not bother talking with them at all.

Noise Levels

Consumers are bombarded with hundreds of marketing messages every day. The challenge of getting your message through to your target market and those people taking notice of it is incredibly hard.

Constant Innovation

The Internet is always changing. These changes affect the job you do every day. The advent of Instant Messaging, E-mail, RSS and Blogs are all affecting your daily job. Embrace and understand how these new technologies do or do not affect your audience

 

So what are the new trends in my humble opinion?

Evolution not Revolution

Existing successful media outlets will continue. We’re nowhere near throwing out paper magazines, newspapers etc. Furthermore, we nowhere near throwing away paper printers in our offices either. So keeping our expertise in dealing with existing media is essential and paramount.

New media opportunities

Whilst our existing media will continue to be important there’s no doubt that new important media outlets are appearing. If our audience are reading blogs then blogs are a new media we need to manage.

Understand the delivery channels

How does your audience want to receive and find information? Is it on a website, in a blog, an e-mail newsletter, an RSS feed or a print publication? It’s your job to find out and deliver it as they want it.

The Corporate Communicator

As Elizabeth pointed out in her post, the organization will communicate directly with it’s audience more frequently across more media types than ever before. As a PR professional it’s up to you to ensure you are proficient in those new areas and that your programs incorporate them tightly to your objectives.

Managing Information

Finally the importance of managing information whether it’s internal collateral or the contact details and preferences of your audience has never been as important. We all must understand the best means of creating, sharing, managing and delivering information to people where and when they want it.

 

I believe that all this innovation is a huge opportunity for the PR business. You are the communications expert. Understand your audience and your media and you will be busier than ever before!

A case study on Nokia's blog marketing

Marketing Sherpa have a really interesting case study on how Nokia used bloggers in the lead up to the launch of their 3650 phone.

The first thing they did was draw up a very well defined list of characteristics of their ideal target blogger. (Age, type of blog etc.)

Then after selecting ten bloggers, they sent an e-mail if they’d be interested in using the new Nokia phone pre-launch.

There was no requirement for the blogger to post to their weblog instead they were asked to upload them to a Nokia site.

In terms of results, several of the chosen bloggers were in the top fifteen referring sites to the Nokia micro-website.  Nokia were very pleased with the results.

Read more at MarketingSherpa – remember that after ten days MarketingSherpa content is subscription only.

An exercise in bad timing…

This afternoon I received an e-mail advert from Unisys promoting Jet Blue’s usage of their servers.

Nothing wrong so far. 

The only problem is that the ad’s tagline reads: “We helped Jet Blue do something unique with their data”.

Now given the trials and tribulations Jet Blue faced last month when it was discovered they provided the travel data from five million customers to the Department of Defence, I’m not sure the ad’s tagline is the cleverest move.

Maybe there’s humor in there!

The exploding world of blogs

According to research just published by Perseus Development Corporation, there are about 4.12 million blogs online – however 2.31 million of these blogs have been abandoned.

Interestingly the reseach, which included over 3,000 random blogs, points to a gender breakdown of 44% male and 56% female.

The most popular age groups (between 10 years and 70 years) for blogging is 13-19 year olds who account for over 50% while the smallest group is 60-69 year olds with 0.3%.

I am always reminded of the phrase: “Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics”, when I look at this kind of research.

How accurate is this research?

I don’t know.  It’s certainly interesting, but I wouldn’t be basing any business decisions on it.

You can read more over at EMarketer.

Quote of the week

“Let the father answer his daughter’s question as to why her favourite cat has been taken away,” Dalenergo Director Nikolai Tkachyov told Russian TV station First Channel.

A Russian electricity company, Dalenergo, which operated in Vladivostok, is planning to confiscate pets to get customers to pay their arrears – which total 300 million roubles (10 million dollars).

Now there’s a challenging excecise in press release writing. [Yahoo]

Technology PR News

 So Scott McNealy’s antics are finally catching up on him.  An open letter to Sun’s board from Merrill Lynch analyst Steven Milunovich which tackles Sun’s business, makes particular reference to Scott’s personality:

“Unfortunately the (Scott’s) act is getting old…. Sending  a clear message with a more pragmatic tone could help. More (some) respect for the competition and for different viewpoints is needed.”

I’ve never been a great fan of the Scott act. Where Larry Ellison comes across as witty and entertaining, Scott fails to make a connection and his ranting has become predicatable. A review and refresh would be worthwhile.

You can download the entire letter from the Merrill Lynch website (sign up for trial access)

 Sad news.  Michael O’Connor Clarke is the latest victim of the current economic difficulties. Michael was lost in the latest round of job cuts at Weber Shandwick Canada, where he was Senior Vice President of their technology group.  A highly capable, well qualified PR professional is in the field.

 Meanwhile, Phil Gomes tackles Microsoft’s increasing usage of sponsored research reports that (amazingly) find their products are better than the competition. Phil suggests that these reports are now subject to the law of diminishing returns and I’d have to agree.

Microsoft is facing into interesting times.  Let’s not be naive, Microsoft is still in good shape, still making good numbers and is admired by millions of people – just look at the number of people who visit their website and buy their products (Note: please no rants about their “monopoly” – a lot of people buy their stuff by choice).  But the company faces a number of serious issues that might impact their company in the longer term. Managing Microsoft over the next five years could be an even harder excercise than it was getting them to the pre-eminent position they hold today.

PR is going to be a core asset over those five years.

PS: The latest issue of G2B Group’s Newsletter is out.

 Vocus has released a new version of it’s PR management software, entitled “Professional Edition” the new version is designed as a budget-priced option.

Hacks and Flacks and why you don't need boutique agencies….

RLM PR, the guys who brought you the book Full Frontal PR sent out their latest newsletter a couple of weeks back.  Unfortunately a work back-log meant I couldn’t have a read of it until today.

The missive includes an interesting, well-written article by Richard Laermer on “Hacks versus Flacks” and other pieces on Sponsorship and Healthcare.

However, one story that caught my eye was written by Michael Princhinello entitled “Industry-Schmindustry“.

Michael believes it’s what you know not who you know that matters.

“In reality, who you know means nothing�reporters get fired, they change beats and they never owe you a favor. It�s all about what you know.”

Now I would agree that a good PR person, is a good PR person regardless of their industry. Good practice is essential, but media relationships don’t matter? I disagree.

In support of his case, Michael gives as an example a campaign RLM did for an eye drops company that sucessfully secured ink in golf magazines….

Furthermore, in response to his own question about whether “focused” agenies are better he argues that:

“In most cases, the answer is no, because focus leads to boredom. Firms that (wrongfully) specialize in the fashion industry churn out the same mailings, pitch the same seven people, and think in a linear, repetitive manner.

It�s best to take your product, service or business to a firm that has proven they can get coverage in any industry because what you have will be a welcomed and exciting change�something new�just what every PR pro is hoping for. “

You see, I mostly disagree here. One of the most common complaints about PR people is that they don’t understand what they are pitching. Specialists are more likely to have an understanding of:

  • The Market
  • The Specific Media
  • The Competitive Landscape

Now there is nothing to stop a generalist getting an understanding of these elements, but to say there’s no requirement for specialists is somewhat trite.

Many companies, particularly in the B2B business, get the best return not from USA Today but their trade magazine. And just as there is nothing to stop a generalist reaching into a vertical, there is nothing to stop a specialist reaching into the general media – as Michael points out – it’s what you know, not who you know…. ahem…

Good PR is about understanding the client’s business goals, their audience and the best vehicles for reaching those audiences.

If you are a solid PR practitioner you will succeed.

I have asked this question time and time again but no one has answered me.  Why is it that PR people feel impelled to slag off their competition to promote their own services?  Focus on what you are good at and let your competitors do the same.

Rash generalizations about the (in)ability of other practitioners doesn’t help anyone. And as a potential buyer, it’s not credible…