Choosing a PR firm is as difficult as ever…

Choosing the best PR firm for your needs is one of the most difficult and demanding marketing tasks you can undertake.

It’s simply not easy.  As a HR person once said to me: “How am I supposed to interview a PR person?”.  After all if the PR people in question can’t effectively pitch their services there’s not much chance of them pitching your wares  –  and the vast majority of PR professionals are great communicators.

In looking for an agency ask yourself a couple of questions:

– Do we need an agency?
– Can we afford an agency?
– Can we provide the chosen agency with the level of support they will need to succeed?
– Where can we find a shortlist?

One of the major points of failure in the client-agency relationship is that the client simply doesn’t understand the nature of their investment in PR. It’s not just a fee or retainer, agencies need the client to invest time in the relationship and provide access to decision makers, information etc. It’s a big investment – and a worthwhile one.

The next point is to clearly understand what you want PR to achieve.  What business goals will PR support? Draft a PR brief that provides all the agencies with a clear picture of what PR you have done to date, how the market conditions are affecting your business, where you believe PR can make a difference, what you are looking for in an agency. The brief provides a single point of reference for your prospective agencies and should include some idea of the potential budget.

You can finding a shortlist of agencies in a number of ways, here’s a few of the more obvious ones:

– Personal Reference
– Internet Search
– Agencies for companies you admire
– Agency listings from your national PR body
– Referrals from journalists or business colleagues

When you’ve identified a shortlist of agencies, contact them and measure their interest then submit your brief to those agencies who have shown interest. They should organize follow up calls to clarify the brief. At this point insist that ONLY those practitioners who will work on the account should attend the pitch meeting.  There are fantastic consultants out there, but if the only time you see them is at the pitch then they are of little use. Successful client-agency relationships are built from good personal relationships or that awful intangible quality: Chemistry.

Each agency’s pitch should be tightly focused on the brief.  If you’re reviewing a number of agencies it can be useful to prepare a scoring card to compare each agency following your meetings. There’s a huge variety of potential measures such as:

– Quality of the proposed account team
– Chemistry (urghhh!)
– Media Relationships (if applicable)
– Measurement?
– International capabilities (if required)
– Responsiveness during the pitch process
– Enthusiasm
– Understanding of your market
– Quality of preparation
– Quality of ideas
– Quality of proposal
– Ability to meet the needs of your business
– Discussion of client conflict and resolutions
– References (past and present clients)

This isn’t exhaustive, but it does provide a framework for measurement. There’s probably a more relevant list for your business.

Once you have made your decision let all the agencies know in a timely manner and then throw yourself into your new agency relationship.  Make the agency part of your internal team and work closely with them.

Is this a failsafe system? Nope. Does it work all the time? Nope. What this will do is try and find the most appropriate agency for your business – whether it works is down to you and the quality of your agency. There are no guarantees.

The UK Times has an article on agency selection that’s worth a read.

A legend speaks…

Howard Ruberstein is synonomous with Public Relations for some of the highest profile individuals in the United States.  When trouble hits, they turn to Howard and his agency [Flash Warning].

He recently gave an interview to Inc magazine that’s defintely worth a read.

“I think that in 10 or 15 years PR will command more respect. You’ll find a far greater sense of ethics. When I was first around, they wouldn’t let the PR person into the room until they made the decision. In 10 years the PR person will be an integral part of the decision-making process and on the executive committees of most major corporations. You see it today–wars are being run on PR, governments, businesses, hey, almost everything.”

If you’re interested in more, here’s a 1999 profile of Mr. Rubenstein.

Thanks to Trevor Cook and Rob Hecht for the link..

"RSS Rocks.." tales of the converted..

Lance Ulanoff writes in PC Magazine about his conversion to RSS.

“I find this an efficient method of content browsing because I don’t have to do anything to collect the new headlines. They come in as sites publish stories, depending on how often those sites publish their RSS feeds, and I can do my viewing in the reader as I wish.”

Press Releases and you…

For me, the essence of good web design boils down to understanding your visitors and enabling them to access relevant, well written content as quickly and easily as possible.

Nothing revolutionary there.

This practice includes avoiding the dreaded Flash infection which impacts usability and hurts search engine optimaization.  It means using standard HTML navigation that visitors are comfortable with.

Gerry McGovern in a recent opinion piece stated that the press release is “awful web content”. He continues:

“Maybe you have to put press releases up on your website for legal reasons. Just know that they are not the reason any sane person would decide to come to your website.”

You see while I agree visitors may not come to the site for press releases, I disagree they don’t serve a valuable function online and offline.

First of all, if we base our navigation on providing the information people need in places they expect to find it, then your press room should provide a full archieve of the company’s press releases. (Press Room design is a separate topic)

The poor Press Release is not always the most effective means of communication, but it serves a purpose.  Journalists know what to expect with a press release. It provides a company’s version of a news event with the factual information, corporate quote and links to more detail.

It’s not always exciting, the reader may not always find it interesting, but it does provide a useful repository of information for website visitors in a format they will expect and can therefore find, navigate and use.

That’s good web content practice.

Gerry also believes that press rooms are less than effective:

“Let�s say I�m a journalist and I�m thinking of doing a story on your organization. Where is the last place I�m going to look? You guessed it! The media/press section. I�m going to root around your website to try and find something interesting. I�m certainly not going to be corralled into your media section and fed the story you�d like me to write.”

I think Gerry (who was a journalist in the deep past) is getting confused with Woodward and Bernstein here. Most corporate websites do provide useful product or service information but they are rarely the receptacle of dark corporate secrets.

Getting back to the basics of good navigation and providing visitors with the information they want in the place they expect.  The press room serves an important purpose.

If a journalist is looking for PR contacts, artwork, the date a product shipped, the raw details on a product such as features and price, they’ll head to the press room.

Good press rooms provide contact details, artwork, background information, forthcoming events, links to relevant background materials etc. In essence it can provide a useful portal for visitors (and journalists) who wish to find out the basics, check information and then delve deeper.

That’s good.

What’s the alternative? No press room? No standard repository of information and resources? Endless searching for contact details? No standard means of providing information on what the company is doing and has done?

Steady on. The press release and the press room are alive and well and both serve a purpose.  In fact our press room is one of the most popular sections on the website – someone’s visiting it.

Yes there are improvements to be made and yes we can all probably apply our skills to making press releases more effective, but let’s make sure the baby doesn’t fall out of the bath.

Good online communication is not simply about innovative formatting and wacky new ways to deliver information. It is the marriage of good online practice with tried and tested traditional techniques.

Of course, that’s only my opinion…

Why should anyone profit from disgrace?

Jayson Blair‘s new book may be the PR/Media meme of the moment but I won’t be contributing to his comfortable retirement.

I have to say, I am becoming sick and tired of people, who through dishonesty, laziness and an innate belief that they shouldn’t have to work hard like the rest of us, get rich promoting their dishonestly. (That was a long sentence but it has released some of the pressure from my chest so that’s a good thing!).

Don’t buy his miserable book, you’ll learn nothing and will help reward someone who clearly thinks they are better that you and me. No thanks bud.

Richard Laermer, in the latest issue of RLM’s newsletter, gives some first hand examples of how this leech operated. What more do you need to know? I wouldn’t read this book if it was handed to me. 

RSS by e-mail

Now whilst one of the benefits of RSS has been its ability to circumvent e-mail overload, many people actually like RSS updates delivered by e-mail.

A former colleague of mine, Andy Grove (not that Andy Grove) has been toying around with RSS and is offering a free service “My RSS Alerts” which delivers the latest RSS feeds from your favorite sources directly to your inbox.

The service is still in its early stages but it’s really simple to subscribe, try it out.