Is the cure worse than the disease?

Sometime it is.

E-mail has some well documented issues.

Foremost on my e-mail hates list are spam, cc politics and laziness.

But do we want to go back to the time before E-mail?

Not me. For all it’s problems, and for all the potential of RSS as a publishing medium, E-mail remains an effective tool for what it offers.

Yes it promotes laziness.  Yes people surreptitously delegate using e-mail. Yes corporations substitute good communication for e-mail.  But does that make it bad?  No.  IMHO. 

E-mail makes it easy to share, store and find information.

News that UK company, Phones 4U has banned all internal e-mail is certainly an interesting departure.

The company’s CEO commented that:

“It’s a very effective tool if used properly…. While I do believe that e-mail in general is the absolute cancer of British business, I only believe that because of the misuse of it.”

I think he has a point, and he believes his staff will save three hours a day.  But banning all internal e-mail?

When I think back to the days before e-mail I remember a lot of time being wasted in unnecessary meetings and on unneccessary phone calls.  Certainly in my case, I estimate I am doing at least fifty percent more per day than in the days before e-mail – even with spam and lazy e-mail.

There is of course a case for balance. 

Phone, face-to-face contact, meetings, bulletin boards and Intranets are all essential, but e-mail does help information move around an organization and reduces the time that it takes to achieve many tasks.

I certainly wouldn’t like to live in an organization where everything had to be conducted through the phone or face-to-face.