And now for a nice fresh PR carrot…

OK, OK, so the first post of the day was little depressing.  So here’s a positive PR post to balance things out!

The Venture Blog, a blog about all things venture capital, has a well written post from Abigail Johnson of PR firm, Roeder-Johnson, on the importance of PR.

“Notice that this is NOT publicity or hype. Though some of the tools used to accomplish this strategic communications probably include working with the press and analysts, the goal of this kind of effort is a long-term market understanding of a company’s leadership.”

Listening to the market… part deux

Phil Gomes over at the G2B Group has been one of the early advocates of distributing PR information over RSS. (For more information on RSS here’s a previous post)

Whilst I don’t believe e-mail is dead, certainly RSS feeds offers a useful alternative means of providing corporate and personal information. Journalists can subscribe to your RSS feed and as you push news out, they are automatically updated. This is a powerful means of diseminating information.

Phil has posted a great piece on why RSS is going to be increasingly important to PR professional. He includes a link to an article by Dan Gillmor of the San Jose Mercury News that was published in Computerworld:

“The best reason so far to adopt RSS in a big way is its effect on the technology that we all once loved but is now so polluted: e-mail. Sending marketing messages and newsletters via e-mail has become a fool’s errand; the obvious work-around is RSS. I’d much prefer to get public relations materials this way.”

PR people: Are you listening to the market?

When we undertake marketing or PR programs for a client or employer, one of the first steps is finding out how the organizations’ audiences percieve the client.

This takes many forms but one of the mainstays is the interview.  We talk with journalists, partners and customers to get a better view of the strengths and weaknesses of the organization.

So how is PR faring?

Last week I linked to an article by Loren Pomerantz that attempted to tackle the divide between PR and the media. The response (from the media) has been illuminating and depressing.

It’s best summed up by Mitch Wagner, who among other things works over at Internet Week.

Here’s how Mitch sees PR:

“Here’s what most of the PR people I deal with are like:

  • They do not know much about technology.
  • They don’t know much about the industry.
  • They know hardly anything at all about my publication.
  • Their main interest is not in having me write an article about their client. Their main interest is in having me INTERVIEW their client. I have been told that this is because (1) the interview makes more of an impression on the client than the actual article and (2) they can bill the client by the hour for sitting in on the interview.
  • In general, most of them are 22-year-olds straight out of  college, with little experience in the technology industry.
  • They behave very much like telemarketers. They have a script which they are not authorized to deviate from, or which they are unable to deviate from. And if I say I’m not interested in a story, they will ignore me and keep talking until I get them off the phone.

There are many exceptions to these rules, but these rules do apply to about 95 percent of the PR people who contact me.”

Wow. Now if you got this response from a survey of your clients, you would (rightly) believe that there was a lot of very hard work ahead.

It’s clear that we as a profession are failing on one of the most important aspects of our job.

It’s time to take control of your media relations.  It’s time to make sure that media facing staff, know their clients, know their media, know their publications and know the market.

Now, this all sounds very obvious.  But it’s clearly not being done.  I think this is a useful wake up call. Thanks are due to Mitch for his honesty.