Here are a selection of links to some interesting content I found during my most recent attempt to review all my RSS feeds…
Public Relations & Media Content
PR Agency pitches..
I missed this, but fascinating discussion nonetheless. In the UK, following an agency pitch process, confused.com decided to pay some of the unsuccessful (no one is a loser on this blog :-)) PR agencies for some of their ideas. Mark Pinsent has stirred a fantastic discussion with a post about how the pitch process is dead. There’s some great content in the comments including a great response from Kelly Davies at Confused.com (quoted below). Mark has a follow up post here and Clive Armitage weighs in on the issue here. My two cents? Hiring the right PR firm is incredibly challenging. It’s not just about credentials…
Not all agencies are suited to all clients and a pitch is much more than just presenting a load of ideas. It’s about feeling the passion, the hunger and although I hate the phrase, the ‘chemistry’. I’m not going to choose an agency based on a creds pitch. For me that’s akin to buying a pair of shoes without trying them on. I have done this on many occasions and I always end up taking them back.
Lines of journalism….
Over at Ragan a guest post by Vanessa Horwell claims that “Times’ David Pogue blurs journalism lines”
Tech bloggers—a notoriously vociferous and at times a moody bunch (any PR pro who’s dealt with tech and/or mobile bloggers can comment on this)—seem to be leading the mob, with virtual pitchforks in hand. But the real question is will this affect Pogue and the Times, and what does this controversy say about the ever-blurring line between journalism and unvarnished opinion?
The beauty of social media is that David responds to this post in the comments:
Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. However, your whole column is based on one truly awful error…
The implications of new media…
Recommended reading: The Atlantic has a very interesting feature: “The story behind the story”
There’s more here than just an old journalist’s lament over his dying profession, or over the social cost of losing great newspapers and great TV-news operations. And there’s more than an argument for the ethical superiority of honest, disinterested reporting over advocacy. Even an eager and ambitious political blogger like Richmond, because he is drawn to the work primarily out of political conviction, not curiosity, is less likely to experience the pleasure of finding something new, or of arriving at a completely original, unexpected insight, one that surprises even himself. He is missing out on the great fun of speaking wholly for himself, without fear or favor. This is what gives reporters the power to stir up trouble wherever they go. They can shake preconceptions and poke holes in presumption.
You have to promise not to print…
Frank Shaw discusses the death of the embargo.
Social Media Content
Blind ignorance isn’t an excuse…
Shel Holtz on why he believes that social media is not a car.
There’s an age-old analogy that keeps coming up in social media talks I hear. “You don’t need to know how it works,” the analogy goes, “just like you don’t need to know how internal combustion works to drive a car.”
It’s a fine analogy for a consumer using social media. It doesn’t wash for communicators.
Social media: fact or fiction…
“Is social media overrated? No, but be flexible” – Shel Israel.
My point is to go into social media with a sense of who you want to reach and why. But be prepared for surprises and pack flexibility into your approach. Surprises happen and social media allows you to adapt and adjust with greater ease, less time and lower cost than other available options.
Will we miss the guru…(yeah right)
Gary Goldhammer advises: “Let’s say goodbye to the social media guru” – A-B-S-O-L-U-T-E-L-Y
All media today is social, so in my opinion there is no “social media.” And there are no gurus either, only those who know a little more than some others – and trust me, the others aren’t too far behind.
Get on with it…
Louis Gray has penned a guest post over on Brian Solis’ blog: “Stop talking about social media and go do it already”
Companies that do leverage social media need to recognize that by participating in these social networks, they are asking customers to do the equivalent of inviting them into their homes. By saying you are a “fan” of a product on Facebook, or that you are “following” a company on Twitter, you are translating the abstract corporate behemoth to something that is personal. And with that personal element comes an unwritten promise, that you will act in a way that is respectable, like a “friend”. And as you know, friends don’t kiss and tell.
Great minds think alike…
Seth Godin and Tom Peters on blogging.