At the risk of appearing (to the digerati at any rate) as something resembling a father dancing at his teenager’s party, can I ask a question?
The question concerns the current online nom-de-jour: “lifestreaming”. Now stop me if I’m wrong here – and it wouldn’t be the first time – but a Lifestream is just a blog with more stuff on it.
Is that correct?
I mean, seriously, all we’re talking about is a blog (or in 1990s parlance a “web site”) with content aggregated from a host of different sources such as Twitter or Friendfeed or whatever you are having yourself.
So in essence a lifestream is just a blog with more stuff, right? A blog. A blog with more stuff.
Maybe I’m missing something.
Sometimes I really am amazed at our continuing need to re-name things to make them sound like they are far more important than they are… this affliction is often most acute when it comes to social media.
I mean, this piece from Business Week on Gordon Bell (from Microsoft Research) is more how I think of a Lifestream.
In the meantime, I think we’d all be better advised to focus on understanding how social media can positively impact our business.
Maybe I’m getting old, then again I’ve eight or nine years before I mortify my son at his party.