PR Retirement Home

As long as I have worked in PR there has always been an uneasy relationship between those that practice in an agency and those that practice in-house.

As someone who has spent time in both roles, this doesn’t really surprise me.  After all working in an agency and working inside are in many respects very different jobs. I always tell students they should try and get experience of both sides of the profession, because at the very least, it will provide them with a broader perspective.

Over the past couple of weeks I met with a number of friends and former colleagues and I was stunned.

On a number of occasions I heard working in-house referred to as a type of nursing home for those no longer able to work in a "real job" i.e. the agency.

The comments were prefaced with: "no disrespect Tom but…"

The interesting things was that these comments came from people with little or no in-house experience.

There is no doubt that the differences between agency and in-house are many fold, but just in case anyone is looking at moving in-house as part of their end of career wind down process, I’d think again. :-)

Working in-house isn’t a retirement plan…

2 thoughts on “PR Retirement Home

  1. Here, here. As another who has worked on both sides of the fence I’d definitely agree that in-house isn’t a retirement home. Some aspects of the job are easier, others harder. But neither is as challenging, exhilarating and fun as starting and growing your own agency 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *